PHPP School — Ongoing Support for Practitioners | BEO Science NZ

The practitioner membership for
confident PHPP modelling.

Use PHPP accurately on any project — new build, design analysis, or retrofit assessment. Monthly Q&A, model reviews, ANZ-specific calibration, and a permanent library of timestamped discussions, all in one place.

ANZ practitioners Model review Monthly Q&A From $79/month New build · Design analysis · Retrofit
Completed our Energy Modelling with SketchUp, DesignPH & PHPP course? PHPP School picks up where that course ends — past the tool workflow and into accurate modelling across new builds, design analysis, and existing building assessments. The SketchUp/DesignPH course teaches you how to complete a PHPP file. PHPP School teaches you how to trust the result. Upgrade to Practice or Professional to add model reviews and live Q&A.

Ten modules. One tool. Every project type.

PHPP School is a modelling course — not a Passive House certification course. The curriculum covers accurate use of the PHPP tool across new builds, design analysis, retrofit assessments, and performance comparisons. Certification is one application. Confident modelling is the goal.

01
What PHPP actually is, isn't, and is used for
PHPP is a quasi-steady-state energy modelling tool with specific methodological limits. This module covers what it can answer reliably — and what requires a different tool. Covers application across new build design, performance comparison, retrofit baseline assessment, and certification. Establishes the frame for everything that follows.
ModuleFoundationAll project types
02
Window entry — multi-sash & frame fractions
A two-casement unit entered as quantity 1 underestimates frame losses and miscalculates solar gains. Fixed and opening frame dimensions are not interchangeable.
ModuleReview checklistQ&A
03
Shading — oversimplified or over-conservative
Beginners either hide overheating risk with shallow shading assumptions, or mask solar gains with excessive shading. Designs that over-rely on glazing to hit heating targets are vulnerable when specs change late.
ModuleReview checklistQ&A
04
MVHR duct data — incomplete or omitted
When duct length, diameter, and insulation are missing, PHPP assumes zero duct losses. Effective efficiency matches the manufacturer's lab figure — not the installed system. This discrepancy is always caught at commissioning.
ModuleReview checklist
05
Material values — marketing data vs lambda 90/90
Thermal conductivity copied from product brochures instead of independently verified lambda 90/90 values. Certifiers correct these. Late-stage redesigns follow.
ModuleReview checklistANZ library
06
Cooling load — 24-hour average vs peak NZ/AU
PHPP outputs a 24-hour average cooling load — not a peak. In NZ lightweight construction with intermittent heat pump use, treating this figure as a peak leads to undersized cooling equipment. A uniquely ANZ problem that European training never addresses.
ModuleANZ specificQ&A
07
Ventilation defaults — German occupancy vs NZ rules NZ/AU
PHPP defaults are calibrated for German housing density and Part F equivalents. NZ ventilation requirements imply different flow rates. The mismatch doesn't surface until measured commissioning reveals actual flows.
ModuleANZ specificQ&A
08
Misreading the overheating check
PHPP's overheating check is a single-zone tool. It masks room-level problems when solar gains are concentrated, and it is not valid for complex non-residential buildings or atypical internal gain profiles.
ModuleReview checklistQ&A
09
PHPP as a compliance form, not a design tool
Data entered too late in the process leaves no flexibility when a small window spec change or late shading revision pushes the model over its limits. PHPP is most powerful when it runs alongside the design, not after it.
ModuleQ&A
10
PHPP for existing buildings — retrofit baseline and improvement modelling
Most PHPP training assumes a new build. This module covers applying PHPP to an existing building — establishing as-built performance as a baseline, then modelling improvement scenarios: insulation upgrades, window replacement, MVHR retrofit, airtightness improvement. No certification pathway assumed. The tool applied to real retrofit decisions.
ModuleRetrofitExisting buildingsQ&A

Start with the course. Stay for the support.

The ongoing membership is where the real value is — for any practitioner running PHPP on live projects.

Foundationsone-time Practice$79/monthor $790/year Professional$197/monthor $1,970/year
Course — 10 modules (new build, design analysis & retrofit)
Certificate of completion
Pre-submission checklist
Monthly live Q&A session
Community forum access
Model health check (1/month)
ANZ material value library
PHPP version update briefings
Model review — 48hr turnaround $350 (member rate) Unlimited
Unlimited model health checks
2 × 30-min 1:1 sessions / year
Price $497 $79/month
or $790/year
$197/month
or $1,970/year
Enrol now → Join Practice → Join Professional →
Model Review — single
$350 member · $450 non-member
Full PHPP audit against all ten error categories. Written report. 48-hour turnaround. Conducted by a PHI-certified consultant who also certifies projects — the same person who will review your submission.
Model Review — 3-pack
$900 $300 per review
Three full reviews, valid for 12 months. Transferable across projects and team members. Practices running multiple PH projects annually find this the most cost-effective option.
The model review service
Independent PHPP quality review — for any project, any purpose.

Every model review checks your PHPP against all ten error categories above — TFA methodology, window entry, shading assumptions, MVHR completeness, lambda values, output interpretation, and ANZ-specific cooling and ventilation calibrations. The written report is structured under those headings so you know exactly what was checked and what needs addressing.

PHPP School reviews are independent quality checks on your modelling — they are not certification assessments, pre-certification approvals, or guarantees of any outcome. Your certifier reviews your project independently and always has the final word. What a PHPP School review does is help you find and fix modelling errors before they cost time in the certification process — or on any project where PHPP output is informing design decisions.

Reviews are useful well beyond certification work. If you're using PHPP to inform a heating and cooling strategy, assess design options, or advise a client on thermal performance — getting a second set of expert eyes on the model is valuable regardless of whether the project is going for certification.


Built for NZ and Australian conditions.

Two modules address issues that only surface on NZ and Australian projects — taught from direct local experience. They apply regardless of whether the project is targeting certification.

Cooling load — NZ & AU lightweight construction

PHPP models cooling as a single zone with continuous 24-hour operation and high thermal mass assumptions. NZ and Australian residential construction — lightweight timber frames, intermittent heat pump use — behaves differently. Practitioners who apply the PHPP cooling figure directly to HVAC sizing consistently undersize equipment. This module covers how to read and adjust the output correctly for local construction types.

  • Why PHPP cooling output is an average, not a peak — and what that means for HVAC sizing in NZ/AU
  • Adjusting internal gains, setpoints, and weather assumptions for local conditions
  • When to use supplementary tools alongside PHPP for cooling-dominated climates
Ventilation rates — NZ & AU requirements

PHPP's default ventilation assumptions reflect German occupancy standards and regulatory requirements. NZ and Australian ventilation codes imply different minimum flow rates. Models built on PHPP defaults without local adjustment consistently show a gap at commissioning — when measured flows don't match modelled assumptions. This module documents the correct settings for NZ and AU projects.

  • NZ ventilation requirements and how they translate into PHPP inputs
  • Australian equivalents — jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction summary
  • What to check before commissioning to avoid flow rate surprises

PHPP pre-submission checklist.

A one-page checklist covering the ten most common PHPP errors. Use it before every submission. Free to download — no sign-up required.

BEO Science — Free Download
PHPP Pre-Submission Checklist — ANZ
Covers: TFA methodology · Window entry · MVHR completeness · Lambda values · Cooling load interpretation (NZ/AU) · Ventilation defaults · Shading · Overheating check. One page. PDF.
Geometry & areas
TFA measured consistently — boundary method documented
Heat-loss area boundary matches U-value build-up boundary
Windows
Multi-sash units entered as separate lights, not single quantity
Frame dimensions verified against supplier data
MVHR & ventilation
Duct length, diameter and insulation entered — not omitted
Ventilation rate checked against NZ requirements, not German default
Material values
Lambda values are lambda 90/90 — not marketing data
ANZ outputs
Cooling load treated as 24-hr average — not used as peak for HVAC sizing
Overheating check — single-zone limitation noted if non-residential
Download free →
PDF · No sign-up

Group sessions. Recorded. Every discussion timestamped and searchable.

The monthly Q&A runs as a group session — not individual calls. That's by design: the range of questions is more useful to everyone, and the full library of past sessions stays on the platform permanently.

Session format
  • 10 min: One teaching point — a PHPP tip, common error, or version change
  • 50 min: Open Q&A — submit questions in advance or raise live
  • First Thursday of each month, 12:00 NZST
  • Can't attend live? Every session is recorded — watch at any time
The session library
  • Every Q&A recorded and added to the member library within 48 hours
  • Discussions timestamped — jump directly to the question you need
  • Full archive available from day one of your membership
  • Searchable by topic — TFA, windows, shading, MVHR, cooling load, and more
Between sessions — the community forum
  • Post questions any time — responses within 2 business days
  • All discussions timestamped and permanently archived on the platform
  • Pinned threads for the ten most common error categories
  • Members answer each other — the archive compounds in value over time

Do I need to complete the SketchUp, DesignPH & PHPP course first?
No — the Foundations tier includes a complete PHPP modelling course and you can start there. If you've already completed our Energy Modelling course, you have Foundations content already. Contact us to upgrade directly to Practice or Professional.
Does a PHPP School review replace the certifier's review?
No — and it doesn't claim to. If your project is going for PHI certification, your certifier reviews it independently and always has the final word. PHPP School reviews are independent quality checks on your modelling, not certification assessments or pre-approval of any kind. They're also useful on projects that aren't going for certification — any time PHPP output is informing a design decision, having a second expert check the model is worthwhile.
How long does a model review take?
48 hours from receipt of your PHPP file and a brief project summary. The written report covers all ten error categories and is structured so your team can work through corrections systematically.
Is the content relevant to Australian practitioners?
Yes. The ANZ-specific modules (cooling load calibration and ventilation defaults) cover both NZ and Australian conditions. PHPP model review is available to Australian practitioners. NABERS and NCC Section J content is on the roadmap for late 2026.
Can I cancel my membership?
Monthly subscriptions can be cancelled at any time before the next billing date. Annual subscriptions are non-refundable after the first 14 days. Foundations is a one-time purchase with no ongoing commitment.